Skip to main content

What a renminbi revaluation means for commodities, economy


As I don't pretend to be an expert on matters of currency movements, here are comments from a few more knowledgeable sources on the recent policy shift in the Chinese renminbi (yuan) currency peg.

1. China to put renminbi in a currency basket - Daily Reckoning. "The renminbi is now 'flexible!'" These cats reckon that moves higher in the RMB vs. the dollar are not a foregone conclusion (as many/most suspect).

2. Chinese yuan under 5 by 2020 - Maoxian. Chairman Maoxian sees a long-term controlled appreciation of the Chinese currency that is likely to suit the country's own interests (and timetable).

3. Yuan revaluation impact to be limited - PragCap. Bondsquawk contributes this post on the revaluation, noting that deterioration in the euro is having an effect on "China's plan of allowing considerable appreciation for the yuan".

4. Chinese currency: why Americans should care about yuan revaluation - CSMonitor. Notes on how the exchange rate flexibility announcement could affect Chinese export prices and prices of US exports into China.

On a related theme, Wall Street Journal notes that anticipation of a stronger RMB has "sparked hopes of increased Chinese demand for commodities". As noted in the WSJ piece, some of the basic materials and metals mining stocks are getting a boost today on the revaluation.

While traders are taking the yuan revaluation news as a sign of strength for resources and the global economy, we wonder if investors like Felix Zulauf would agree with this one day verdict.

Zulauf and Marc Faber were both recently quoted in Barron's mid-year Roundtable as saying they expected a downturn for commodity prices, along with a slowdown (or "tightening") in China and the resource economies (Australia & Brazil) tied to its economic prospects.

Will the yuan revaluation turn out to be more of a strategic move which favors China rather than its economic rivals and resource suppliers?
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .
Read more

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...
Read more

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...
Read more