Skip to main content

What a renminbi revaluation means for commodities, economy


As I don't pretend to be an expert on matters of currency movements, here are comments from a few more knowledgeable sources on the recent policy shift in the Chinese renminbi (yuan) currency peg.

1. China to put renminbi in a currency basket - Daily Reckoning. "The renminbi is now 'flexible!'" These cats reckon that moves higher in the RMB vs. the dollar are not a foregone conclusion (as many/most suspect).

2. Chinese yuan under 5 by 2020 - Maoxian. Chairman Maoxian sees a long-term controlled appreciation of the Chinese currency that is likely to suit the country's own interests (and timetable).

3. Yuan revaluation impact to be limited - PragCap. Bondsquawk contributes this post on the revaluation, noting that deterioration in the euro is having an effect on "China's plan of allowing considerable appreciation for the yuan".

4. Chinese currency: why Americans should care about yuan revaluation - CSMonitor. Notes on how the exchange rate flexibility announcement could affect Chinese export prices and prices of US exports into China.

On a related theme, Wall Street Journal notes that anticipation of a stronger RMB has "sparked hopes of increased Chinese demand for commodities". As noted in the WSJ piece, some of the basic materials and metals mining stocks are getting a boost today on the revaluation.

While traders are taking the yuan revaluation news as a sign of strength for resources and the global economy, we wonder if investors like Felix Zulauf would agree with this one day verdict.

Zulauf and Marc Faber were both recently quoted in Barron's mid-year Roundtable as saying they expected a downturn for commodity prices, along with a slowdown (or "tightening") in China and the resource economies (Australia & Brazil) tied to its economic prospects.

Will the yuan revaluation turn out to be more of a strategic move which favors China rather than its economic rivals and resource suppliers?

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and