Skip to main content

Dow 10,000, we meet again

Being plugged into the market chatter on Twitter and Stocktwits, it was hard to avoid yesterday's talk (often dismissive) of a return to Dow 10,000.

So now we're back to the vaunted high number mark that serves to remind us of the glory days of the dot.com era & the possibility for an even higher 5 digit readout in the not-too-distant future. But what does Dow 10,000 really mean, if anything at all?

Noting the fact that inflation over the past decade has reduced our purchasing power by at least 20-30 percent, we should remind ourselves that a trip back to a nominal high in a widely followed market average does not automatically translate to money in our pockets.

Reflecting on these thoughts yesterday, I went off to dig up my old copy of the Wall Street Journal from March 30, 1999, the first time the Dow Jones Industrial Average crossed 10,000. I could not find that old paper, but I did find this interesting article instead.

Excerpt from, "Dow 10,000 and the Lost Decade":

"
I have made it a habit to save the print edition of the Wall Street Journal on certain key dates including March 30, 1999, the day after the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) first crossed 10,000.

Although the DJIA is a
flawed benchmark, no other index has captured the imagination of the public to the same degree. As we again approach the 10,000 level, there appears to be no shortage of commentators ready to discuss what this means for the overall market. It comes as no surprise that value investors attach no particular significant to round numbers for individual stock quotations or for market indices.

However, it is hard to avoid recognizing the obvious fact that the past decade has seen very disappointing returns for index investors given that stocks started the ten year period at very high valuations. This is true of many individual DJIA components as well...
"

Read on for a very interesting look at the market's performance over the past decade, along with some worthwhile notes on the changes we've seen in media, business, and the debt and commodity markets over that time frame.

Related articles and posts:

1. The great "bear market rally" post - Finance Trends.

2. The Invisible Crash: book review - Financial Sense.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .