Skip to main content

Obama's plan could boost Fed's power

Dear leader Obama is speaking out today on another of his far-ranging plans to "save the world"; this time it's a proposal to reshape financial industry regulation and expand the powers of the Federal Reserve.

Bloomberg has the details:

"
President
Barack Obama said his plan to refashion supervision of the U.S. financial system is needed to fix lapses in oversight and excessive risk taking that helped push the economy into a prolonged recession.

The proposal, much of which will be subject to approval by Congress, sets out the biggest overhaul of market rules in more than seven decades, adding an additional layer of regulation for the biggest firms. It would create an agency for monitoring consumer financial products, make the Federal Reserve the overseer of companies deemed too big to fail, and bring hedge and private equity funds under federal scrutiny.


“This was a failure of the entire system,” Obama said at a White House event that included the leaders of the Treasury, the Fed and other regulatory agencies. “An absence of oversight engendered systematic, and systemic, abuse.”

The announcement marks the beginning of what promises to be a political battle that’s likely to alter the president’s plan. Obama, who has called the “sweeping overhaul” of regulations one of his top domestic priorities, said wants to sign legislation to enact it by the end of the year."

Note the grand legitimizing theme: we need this overhaul due to "a failure of the entire system" (read: managed capitalism) and a supposed "absence of oversight" in the financial sector.

However, as anyone who has studied the situation already knows, many of the huge disasters of this financial panic have occurred in the most regulated sectors of the economy, namely the "too big to fail" banks and insurance firms.

As hedge fund manager John Paulson pointed out in last fall's DC hearings on hedge funds and the financial crisis, it was the heavily regulated banks which contributed most to the building panic due to their overleverage and imprudent bets on mortgage-backed bonds.

Let's not forget the remarkable failure of OFHEO (now part of FHFA), the oversight committee tasked specifically to watch Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which somehow managed to sign off on Fannie and Freddie's accounting practices just before these "government-sponsored-enterprises" admitted to manipulating earnings in a huge accounting fraud scandal.

Actually, OFHEO released a lengthy report on accounting irregularities at Fannie Mae in 2004, but the warnings were largely ignored by the media and attacked by politicians friendly with the GSEs. Where was the saving grace of government regulation in this instance?

Obama's lecture on financial regulation also (conveniently) fails to recognize the enormous role that government had in fostering the conditions which built this crisis, namely the Fed's easy money policies (which gave rise to the housing bubble) and the expansion of a social engineering program designed to encourage homeownership, no matter what the eventual cost was to the individual or society.

We could go on and on in this fashion, but it's best to just cut to the chase and say what needs to be said. The government is seeking to expand its reach (and the Fed's) over the private economy, on the heels of a financial crisis it helped create.

For more on this, please listen to the Thomas Woods Meltdown interview and see the related articles below.

Related articles and posts:

1. Thomas Woods: Meltdown interview - Finance Trends.

2. The Bailout Reader - Mises.org.

3. The Myth of Systemic Collapse - Real Clear Markets.

4. Government intervention fuels the crisis - Finance Trends.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…