Skip to main content

The end of the broker-dealers?

First it was Bear Stearns that went under, sold at the last moment in a fire-sale deal to JPMorgan Chase back in March.

Then it was Lehman Brothers, who filed for bankruptcy early Monday after unsuccessfully attempting to strike a quick takeover/rescue deal this past weekend.

Now Merrill Lynch has announced it will be taken over by Bank of America in an all stock deal valuing Merrill at $50 billion. The deal was arranged quickly over the weekend, as fears of a possible Lehman failure were starting to spread to other major investment banks.

Bloomberg reports on the "'Tectonic' shift on Wall Street as Lehman Fails, Merrill Sold":

"In the biggest reshaping of the financial industry since the Great Depression, two of Wall Street's most storied firms, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., headed toward extinction.

New York-based Lehman, founded 158 years ago, said early today that it plans to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after failing to find a buyer. Merrill Lynch, 94 years old and also based in New York, agreed to sell itself to Bank of America Corp. for $50 billion in an emergency deal hashed out yesterday...

...The five New York-based securities firms that dominated Wall Street have been reduced to two: Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley. While both firms are scheduled to report a drop in third-quarter earnings this year, their business has remained profitable throughout 2008 -- unlike Lehman and Merrill. "

Interesting to see that Merrill Lynch is being acquired at a nice premium ($29 a share) to its closing price of $17.05 on Friday. Especially when you consider that this deal was quickly cobbled together in what had to be a desperate attempt by Merrill to avoid Lehman's fate.

Marc Faber had a few things to say about that, and other aspects of the Lehman and Merrill news, in this latest Bloomberg interview.

So now that Bear, Lehman, and Merrill have been swallowed up or gone bust, what will become of the remaining "big five" broker-dealers? Is their business model fatally flawed? Will a similar fate befall Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley?

Here's what Nouriel Roubini had to say back in July:

"The broker/dealer business model is "inherently unstable" and the four remaining major firms will not be independent in a few years, says Nouriel Roubini, economics professor at NYU's Stern School and chairman of RGE Monitor.Embattled Lehman Brothers is likely to seek a buyer "within months," Roubini says.

Lehman Brothers ceasing to be independent is not such a shocking outcome, but Roubini ultimately sees a similar outcome for Goldman, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley.The problem, he says, is that broker/dealers use the same model as banks -- borrow short and lend long -- only they borrow on even shorter timeframes, use more leverage, and don't have the kind of government backstop banks enjoy."

We are not rooting for the failure of any of these firms, but it seems this weekend's developments have really shined a light on the remaining independent US investment banks.

As the financial crisis rolls on, and losses from the credit crisis steadily rise, some venerable US financial institutions are now having to face the music as sentiment regarding government-backed bailouts has turned.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…