Skip to main content

Popular sentiment in the blogosphere

One great thing about the blogosphere and the interactive web is that it exposes you to some interesting thoughts and comments from people responding to blog posts, articles, and media clips, all around the world.

All across America, and around the world, it seems people are starting to take more of an interest in where they are getting their information from, and in understanding the agendas driving media companies and news outlets.

Media ownership has become more concentrated and the remaining TV, radio, and print news outlets have become increasingly driven by commercial concerns and a commitment to the bottom-line.

While this focus on profits is to be expected from media-focused corporations (and lauded by their shareholders and directors, at least in the short-term), it tends to bring about an accompanying decline in the quality of news reporting and the variety of news stories offered.

As "hard news" stories and international coverage drop off, and reporting standards and quality declines, the reading and viewing public loses out.

This shift leaves more discriminating readers and viewers cold, and these once-dependable "news consumers" are voting with their feet, with many canceling their newspaper and cable TV subscriptions altogether. Many of these disillusioned news patrons are now opting to get a large part of their news and information from a variety of online news sources and opinion outlets, such as blogs, international news websites, and trusted financial websites and communities.

Here's one recent example of this shift, courtesy of the reader comments at Barry Ritholtz' blog, The Big Picture.

While reading through the comments responding to Barry's takedown of a recent Barron's cover story ("Why Barron's Housing Cover is So Terribly Wrong"), I noticed these revealing remarks from readers "Unsympathetic" and "bluestatedon":

"Mainstream media is gratuitous schlock, not worthy of consideration. Famed? Perhaps to baby boomers who are used to respecting public figures. I'm 30. Until proven otherwise, I believe everything I see on TV or in print.. is pure spin, and factually incorrect." - Unsympathetic.

The second commenter agrees with the above and elaborates:

"IMHO a big part of the problem is found in the gradual corporatization of the media, but I also have concluded it's also a product of crappy journalism programs at the collegiate level. And you can also include our rotting and decrepit public education system.

For obvious reasons, an adequately functioning democracy absolutely requires the voting public to be well-informed, and a crucial link in that process are people who work at furnishing the truth to the public. Today's class of journalists are, by and large, more suited to an authoritarian state than a democracy. The trouble is, I doubt that your average mainstream "journalist" would be able to write a coherent paragraph describing the functional and legal differences between the two systems. As long as they have a nice lunch and get to quit work at 5, it's all the same to them.

Which is why the dirty, filthy bloggers laboring amongst the internet tubes are so important. Yes, there's plenty of crap on the internet, but if you know where to look (this site, as an obvious example), the truth — and real, hard, information — is available." - bluestatedon.

What you see here is a complete lack of faith in the traditional mass media sources that have dominated the spectrum for the last hundred years.

We also seem to have reached a point where many in America are now expressing outrage and disbelief over the current state of the nation and the treachery of our supposed political leaders and a pliant media. These sentiments are not limited to certain financial blogs; you can find them in just about any online news site or blog that hosts reader comments.

Of course, there are still some excellent journalists and mainstream news sources out there. Regular readers of this blog know that I am fond of reading and quoting from the Financial Times and Bloomberg, to name two such examples.

In fact, I suspect news outlets that remain committed to maintaining high standards of quality in their reporting will buck the trend of mainstream media abandonment and acquire new readers and viewers in the long-run. Many of these converts will be those who jumped ship from other newspapers and media outlets where eroding standards and lack of reader/viewer accountability are evident.

But for now we seem to see, in the blogosphere and the interactive web, a growing distrust of politicians, appointed government officials, and the MSM (mainstream media) as a whole.

How does it look out there to you?

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .