Skip to main content

Sector broadening in the art market

The global art boom continues, as wealthy buyers from around the world continue to purchase rare and expensive works of contemporary, impressionist, and modern art.

But according to recent reports in the Financial Times and The Economist, buyers now seem favor works by lesser known artists in the impressionist and modern art movements.

According to the FT, newly rich buyers will be seeking out bright, bold paintings from German expressionists and Italian futurist painters.

""Two years ago, top lots in the impressionist and modern art sales were familiar brands: the Monets, Picassos and Van Goghs. More recently, bolder, brasher artworks by lesser-known artists have been netting record prices and, this summer, German expressionists and Italian futurists will be among the most sought-after catches.

Despite a popular perception that contemporary art sales account for the top prices, the impressionist and modern auctions, which broadly sell art from 1870-1945, are where the serious money is spent. The art auction record was achieved in one of these sales when Picasso's "Garçon à la Pipe" sold at Sotheby's New York in 2004 for $104m. Understanding developments in the impressionist and modern sales, the specialists agree, is key to decoding trends in the upper levels of the art market as a whole.

Helena Newman, Sotheby's vice-chairman of impressionist and modern art, says she has seen a steady influx of new bidders over the past two years. Seven per cent of buyers at her sale in February were new clients, who snapped up 15 per cent of the lots, focusing on bright, bold painting. She sums up their passion with a neat neologism: "Wallpower"."

Italian futurist Gino Severini, whose painting, "Danseuse", is pictured above, provides the model for this new phase of the art boom. "Danseuse" will be prominently highlighted in an upcoming Sotheby's auction, where the painting is expected to set a new record price for the artist. The Economist considers works like these likely to be among the "blue chip names of the future".

"During a buoyant market, houses can stick with identified trends and simply persuade holders of old stalwarts such as Picasso and the French Impressionists, for example, to part with their popular pictures. A far more complex and riskier challenge is trying to hand-pick the blue-chip names of the future.

Sotheby's appears to have had some success in creating a list of new “must-haves” for billionaires. A look at its recent major auctions of 20th-century paintings shows a number of artists who were fairly obscure just two years ago now command prices on par with the best-known artists of the period."

So as the art boom marches forward, record high prices are now being seen for works by previously lesser-known artists. And as both the FT and The Economist point out, as the market for these works has broadened, so has the international pool of art buyers.

Related articles and posts:

"Sotheby's contemporary art sale - slideshow" - Telegraph.

"The next blue chip" - The Economist.

"Works with Wallpower" - Financial Times.

"That Booming Art Market" - Financial Sense Online.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  

Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…