Skip to main content

Oil vs. Nasdaq: the "bubble" view

As crude oil worked its way back towards the $140 mark last week, the recently favored view of oil as a "speculative bubble" was on full display in the media.

On June 13, a week after crude oil prices made a record move to $139.12 a barrel, Bloomberg covered the bubble view with a story entitled, "Oil Rally Topped Dot-Com Craze in Speculator's Mania". Investors Michael Masters and George Soros were there offering their views of prices in the crude oil market:

``I don't know if you can classify it as a bubble or not,'' said Masters. ``But there is no question that investor demand is having an effect on price. Very little of it has to do with physical supply and demand of crude oil.'' Masters testified at a Senate hearing in May on the role of speculators in commodities markets.

Gains in oil are the result of a ``bubble'' caused by speculation from index funds and a tight balance between supply and demand, Soros said in testimony before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on June 3. ``The bubble is superimposed on an upward trend in oil prices that has a strong foundation in reality,'' he said.

So according to George Soros, the upward move in oil prices, "has a strong foundation in reality", while Masters thinks the move has "little... to do with physical supply and demand of crude oil". Interesting.

Well, differing views make a market, but it does kind of make you wonder where Michael Masters is getting his information on crude oil from, considering the recent phenomenon of shrinking global oil supplies meeting steadily rising global demand.

But, listen, I promised you the "bubble" view, and the bubble view you shall have.

Check out this nifty little chart that Bloomberg put together comparing the run up in crude oil prices to the decade long bull market in the Nasdaq and technology shares: "Crude rally surpasses dot-com boom".


So what do you think? Are recent oil prices a bubble or is this a bull market largely driven by supply and demand fundamentals?

Related posts:

"Oil: inflation meets tight supply" - Finance Trends Matter.

"The future of energy" - Finance Trends Matter.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .