Skip to main content

Monday's notes

Some recent stories and business features of note for your Monday reading:

1. Lehman Brothers reports its first loss as a public company and outlines its plan to raise up to $6 billion in common and preferred stock.

2. As prices surge, Argentines cry foul over the official figures - FT.

"As food and fuel costs rise relentlessly, popular and official perceptions of inflation are diverging in many countries. But economists believe Argentines may have more reason than most to doubt the accuracy of their government's calculations. This could spell trouble for a country with a history of economic crises - especially at a time when a three-month-long conflict with farmers is shaking consumer and investor confidence.

When Mr Fernández acknowledged recently that Indec, the statistics agency, "wasn't measuring consumers' reality", many Argentines could not have agreed more. Yet while the government has been reporting what many economists and consumers feel are suspiciously low inflation figures for nearly a year and a half, the cabinet chief has announced changes that he says will result in a figure that is lower still."

This is a storyline familiar to those of us in the US and elsewhere, thanks to rampant money printing and rising inflation worldwide.

3. "The Reverse Wealth Effect". Chris Ciovacco looks at America's financial condition and notes that Americans are now saddled with more debt than ever as real estate and financial asset prices decline.

4. "How the FT is Losing the Financial Opinion Wars" - Felix Salmon.

5. Marc Faber speaks to Bloomberg TV and says stocks, commodities, and real estate are inflated and overvalued.

``I don't see any compelling value in equities, real estate or commodities,'' Faber said from Zurich. ``Contrary to the last 25 years, we are in a period of de-leveraging. Corporate profits in particular are still far too high for 2009 and have to be adjusted downwards, and valuations become less compelling.''

Faber thinks that investors should now focus on what to sell (or avoid), rather than focusing on what to buy.

He also notes that central bankers can increase the quantity of money at will, but they cannot increase the quantity of gold and commodities at the same rate. Therefore, money loses its purchasing power against commodities, the supplies of which are limited. Still, Marc feels the big upside may be gone for commodities, and investors should not buy them blindly.

As you can see, monetary inflation and its effects are a big theme in today's news. Enjoy the articles and remember to connect the dots and look for the related themes within.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  

Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…