Skip to main content

Time to buy financials?

Looking over the news this morning, it seems the big story in the US market is an $11.5 billion "capital injection" for subprime-beleaguered bank UBS.

The European bank will raise the money from Singapore and Middle Eastern investors by selling stakes in the company.

Financial shares, including those of UBS, reacted positively this morning to the news. Which of course, leads all to wonder: is it time to buy financials yet?

Of course the big concern looming over financial companies and their shares is exposure to subprime mortgages and the illiquidity of assets in SIVs.

And in case you still thought the subprime problem was well "contained", you obviously haven't been with us here on Earth these past few months.

As FT Alphaville and Bloomberg point out, even the bond insurers are suspect. Monoline insurer MBIA is now facing scrutiny over its AAA rating as the company faces problems over the subprime CDOs it backs. This in turn spells trouble for all the AAA ratings of the bonds it insures, which could also mean trouble for investors in municipal bonds.

And as we've seen in recent weeks, these concerns are weighing heavily over the shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Recent losses at Freddie and Fannie has increased worry over the state of the GSEs' balance sheets.

So where's the bright spot? Ah, but that's where the value investors come in. You've heard the bear case for financials and GSEs Freddie and Fannie (for a refresher, see the link above). Now get ready for the bull case.

The bullish case for financial stocks was made by several noted value investors at a recent Value Investing Congress seminar hosted by Whitney Tilson.

Tilson highlighted some of these investment ideas in a recent FT column, starting with a buy analysis on shares of Freddie Mac.

On the long side, Rich Pzena of Pzena Investment Management shared his analysis of Freddie Mac, which he prefaced with this emphatic statement: “I’d go so far as to say that Freddie Mac is the single cheapest stock I’ve seen in my career.” (On the day before his presentation, Freddie Mac shares traded at just under $26.) Given his highly successful career, that is saying something.

Pzena’s argument is twofold: first, Freddie Mac’s earnings are likely to be much higher going forward. That is because the prices it is paying for mortgages that it will package into securities have improved markedly, thanks to mortgage sector distress.

It should be noted that not all present at the VIC were bullish on financial shares. Tilson mentions two investors who shared their short ideas. Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital gave a thorough presentation on likely future problems at MBIA and Ambac, while David Einhorn at Greenlight Capital was wary of future losses at Lehman Brothers.

For more on this and other insights from the VIC, see Tilson's column.

So now that you've heard the bull and bear case for several leading financial stocks, this leaves us with only one important question (as heard on Bloomberg TV this morning): "What should the Fed do tomorrow?".

I can only shake my head and smile slightly...

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…