Skip to main content

Marketing war, disease, and genocide

Over the weekend, I spent some time reading the first few chapters of Bill Bonner and Lila Rajiva's brand new book, Mobs, Messiahs, and Markets.

This is shaping up to be a very interesting book so far, so I'll probably write a brief review when I've finished the book, but for now I want to mention something more topical.

During a chapter on war and its accompanying atrocities (with some exaggerated and others ignored), the authors discussed Belgium's colonial rampage through Africa.

They cited the Congo, where agents of Leopold II had, "treated the local blacks worse than slaves; they were rounded up, starved, beaten, and worked to death in forced labor camps. An estimated 10 million died." This is suffering and death on the scale of (or greater than) the Holocaust of the 1930s-1940s, but it is little mentioned today.

This may be due to the passage of time, or the fact that the Congo remains far removed from our location and thought to this day. In its own time, the Congo was a subject taken up by writers such as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Joseph Conrad, and Mark Twain, and in recent years by Thomas J. Fleming and others.

Still, very little is said today about the past suffering in the Congo. For that matter, there seems to be little attention to the ongoing strife and suffering in the Congo today, which is where the following Chicago Tribune article comes in.

The question that this article poses is this: with 4 million people killed and 800,000 displaced in the Congo over the past 10 years, why aren't more people paying attention?

From, "Congo: The invisible war".

Three years after the Bush administration officially labeled the crisis in Darfur a genocide, thus elevating it above other wars in Africa, many Congolese -- and not a few aid workers -- are asking essentially the same question as Masirika: With the Congolese death toll now 20 times higher than that of Darfur, and given that the worst killing in Darfur ended in 2004, why aren't outraged U.S. activists lighting candles in Central Park to "save" hapless Congo?

As the article points out, the crisis in the Congo has taken second stage to the genocide in Darfur. Is it because the tag word genocide has yet to be applied to the killings in Congo?

Maybe the attention deficit is due to the fact that we've yet to see our first Hollywood movie detailing the tragedy and the plight of Congo's people. All these ideas and more are mentioned in the article.

Which brings me to this point. It seems that war and disease must now be marketed with celebrity advocates in order to draw public attention. Just as the hit song or movie is propelled to the top with a positive-feedback loop of success and advertising (success breeds success), it seems the same is now true for the currently fashionable example of disease or war. Today, some genocides are better marketed than others.

But we have to ask the following question: given an unlimited amount of public attention to each global conflict, what good can we expect as a result?

Does increased foreign aid to war-torn countries help people in need, or does it actually have a negative effect for the common people by enriching tyrants and warlords while prolonging human suffering, as globetrotting investor Jim Rogers has argued?

Is there a way to ensure that the people who need help and resources are getting it, rather than having these resources surreptitiously plundered by the outlaws in control? Do sanctions work? Will foreign trade and increased international contact and involvement actually provide a positive, stabilizing effect on war-torn lands?

These are some of the questions that need to be examined if we are truly seeking to help people, instead of just boosting our own conscience and sense of altruism by donating money to the fashionable cause of the year.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

William O'Neil Interview: How to Buy Winning Stocks

Investor's Business Daily founder and veteran stock trader, William O'Neil shared his trading methods and insights on buying winning stocks in an in-depth IBD radio interview.

Here are some highlights from William O'Neil's interview withIBD:

William O'Neil's interest in the stock market began when he started working as a young adult. 

"I say many times that I didn't get that much out of college. I didn't have much interest in the stock market until I graduated from college. When I got married, I had to look out into the future and get more serious. The investment world had some appeal and that's when I started studying it. I became a stock broker after I got out of the Air Force."
He moved to Los Angeles and started work in a stock broker's office with twenty other guys. When their phone leads from ads didn't pan out, O'Neil would take the leads and drive down to visit the prospective customers in person.

"I'd get in the c…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.