Skip to main content

Forecasts for 2008

Goodbye 2007, hello 2008. And to get us started, we have some interesting forecasts and predictions concerning world events and financial markets in the coming year.

On the more "practical" side of the fence we have the Financial Times' predictions for 2008, driven by the FT's "crack corp of pundits" who, "throw caution to the wind and risk humiliation in the pursuit of glory".

So you see, they fully realize the folly of forecasting going in. This awareness, combined with the rather straight-laced tone of their forecasts is what leads me to label this exercise as a more practical and carefully considered example of the art of crystal ball gazing.

Our second batch of forecasts comes from Saxo Bank's Outrageous Predictions for 2008.

I first stumbled upon Saxo's predictions in an english version Pravda article, and at first I thought the dire headline warnings about the direction of the US economy were a work of state-sponsored doomsaying on Russia's part.

But in fact, the predictions of significantly higher oil prices and a stumbling US stock market were the work of Denmark-based Saxo Bank, which traditionally offers its "outrageous" predictions in order to spur thought and debate.

I was very interested to read some of Saxo Bank's calls, especially in the area of commodity prices and in its mention of US politics and Presidential candidate Ron Paul. Give this one a look, because I think you will find these forecasts a worthwhile read as well.

Enjoy both sets of forecasts, and we'll see you back here in 2008. Best New Year's wishes to everyone!

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and