Skip to main content

Dry bulk shipping boom

With the Baltic Exchange Dry Index (BDI) still up near its recent highs above the 10,000 mark, many are wondering if the shipping boom driven by Asian demand will hold.

The Financial Times recently took up this issue by highlighting the view of one shipping executive, Nobu Su, chief of Taiwan Maritime Transport, who offered that current freight shipping rates were "insane".

Here's more from FT's article, "Dry bulk bubble may have bouyancy to spare".

Nobu Su's outspoken comments about the bulk cargo market shine a spotlight on a remarkable piece of price inflation that has been little noticed outside the closed world of shipping.

On Friday, the Baltic Exchange, which collects information about shipping markets, was quoting the standard charter rate for a Capesize dry bulk carrier - the largest kind, so called because it has to sail around Cape Horn and the Cape of Good Hope rather than use the Panama or Suez Canals - at $179,527 per day.

The same rate a year ago was $69,235. The increase is pushing up sharply the costs of many users of the vital commodities that such ships carry - particularly coal and iron ore.

For some commodities, according to Mr Su, the cost of transport can be twice as much as the cost of the cargo when it was delivered to the ship.

So as you see from that last statement, transport costs for in demand commodities have become remarkably expensive.

You don't have to know your Panamax from your Capesize to be able to understand this last point. Just imagine shipping a gift package to a friend by postal service or Fed Ex, only the shipping cost is twice what you spent on the gift.

In that case, you might say "to hell with that, I'll send a card". But in China or India's case, there has been little option but to pay the required rates for much needed commodities.

Will freight costs peak in 2008 or will they retrench a bit, only to keep on rolling? This is a big point of debate, as the shorter-term future of the global economy seems to be wrapped up in this question.

One last point to mention here: notice the chart of the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) vs. the Shanghai Composite (FXI). Is there a strong correlation here?

It seems, judging from this rather short time period, that there has recently been an observable link between the two, with FXI possibly leading the BDI by a couple of months. Thoughts?

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .