Skip to main content

Buffett: don't repeal estate tax

Warren Buffett, that enlightened king of billionaire investors, has voiced his approval for the estate tax (or "death tax" as it's commonly known) and is calling on Congress to maintain the tax, claiming its repeal would be wrong.

From, "Buffett says Estate-Tax Repeal Would Benefit Richest".

Warren Buffett called on Congress to maintain the estate tax, saying that plans to repeal the levy would benefit a handful of the richest American families and widen U.S. income disparity.

Buffett, the billionaire chairman of Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway Inc., told the Senate Finance Committee that advocates of repeal were ``dead wrong'' to call the levy a ``death tax.''

It would be more appropriate to call it a ``death present,'' said Buffett, 77, who is the third-richest person in the world, according to Forbes Magazine. ``A meaningful estate tax is needed to prevent our democracy from becoming a dynastic plutocracy.''

And now, a personal take. I've grown increasingly tired of Buffett's fashionably "democratic", read leftist, approach on political and economic issues.

Buffett is one of the greatest investors the world has ever known, and we all admire him for that, but his apparent need to reconcile his wealth against the needs and wants of society has become tiresome. When I hear him talk about "claim checks" on society and rationalizations for why he bought his company jet, I just want to tell him to stop talking already.

Now that Buffett is advocating the continuation of an estate tax in order to level out what he perceives to be unfair advantages benefiting the inheritors of wealth, it's clear to see that what Buffett really wants is a government that will stamp out inequality and preserve our "democracy" via direct taxation and redistribution of wealth and resources.

``A meaningful estate tax is needed to prevent our democracy from becoming a dynastic plutocracy.'' Heirs to vast fortunes, he said, have already won the ``ovarian lottery'' and shouldn't be further rewarded by the tax system.

From what I've been able to piece together (outside of my wretched public schooling), it seems that America was founded as a republic, one that respected and acknowledged the individual's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Founding Fathers risked their lives in order to throw off tyranny and excess taxation, and to build our country on this footing. While many of them loathed the idea of an entrenched aristocracy as existed in Europe, they were also fearful of the realities of what we reverently refer to as "democracy". The founders rightly regarded democracy as a decayed form of mob rule, in which each group fights the other to secure plundered wealth and resources, and the majority imposes its will on the minority.

Now we've reached the stage where even our greatest and most influential capitalists are publicly committed to the idea of wealth redistribution via government confiscation, out of control governement spending, and ever-expanding social welfare programs. It really makes you wonder.

It's interesting, because I just started rereading an excellent book entitled, Buffett: The Making of an American Capitalist.

I must have read this book five times already, but I like to pick it up every now and then and read certain sections over again. Every time I do, I find myself more interested in the passages on Buffett's father, Howard Buffett, a conservative Omaha businessman who was later elected to represent his home district in the US House of Representatives.

Howard Buffett is described as an isolationist, a New Deal hater, and many other things that would seem unfashionable today. But he was also described as "unshakably ethical", and he left all the Buffett children with an understanding of the woes of big government and inflation.

So while it's no big surprise to see Warren's political views veering off from those held by his father, it's interesting to see that he seems to have left his father's lessons on inflation and its ill effects behind.

Buffett said that in the last 20 years, tax laws have allowed the ``super-rich'' to get richer.

``Tax-law changes have benefited this group, including me, in a huge way,'' he said. ``During that time the average American went exactly nowhere on the economic scale: He's been on a treadmill while the super rich have been on a spaceship.''

Warren blames tax laws for the average American's declining standard of living. While this is a popular theme to invoke, it really overlooks the major causes of stagnant and declining real incomes and standard of living: excessive taxation, spending, and inflation.

It's time we examine the wealth and savings-eroding effects of inflation and our ever increasing reliance on debt to finance our country's activities and our personal needs.

For more on this topic, please read Ron Paul's brief and informative discussion of "The Inflation Tax", as well as Hans Sennholz's essay, "The Envy Tax".

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…