Skip to main content

Advisor turnover roils investors

Article from todays Wall St. Journal on choosing a financial planner. Plus, what to do in the event that your current financial planner retires or sells his business to a larger company.

From , "Advisor turnover roils investors".

When Jerry Roberts got news that his longtime financial planner was retiring and selling his practice to a larger company, "it was very unnerving."

"I very carefully chose my original planner," a sole practitioner in the Robertses' hometown of Indianapolis. "I was cognizant of his investment philosophy, his range of capabilities, and his past experience. I didn't know anything about the new firm coming on," says Mr. Roberts, a 64-year-old retired bank officer.

Like the Robertses, a growing number of people who have spent years building a relationship with a trusted financial adviser are having to start over again with someone new. Planners are getting older -- the average age is 55, and nearly a third are over 60 -- and they are retiring at an accelerating pace, often without a specific succession plan in place. That in turn is helping to fuel a wave of consolidation in the industry, as big financial-advisory firms and banks, including Wachovia Corp., Pennsylvania's Susquehanna Bancshares Inc. and Alabama's Compass Bancshares Inc., seek to control a larger share of Americans' retirement assets.

Read the whole article at the link above. Not just for those whose planners are moving on; there are tips in there for anyone who's shopping around for a financial planner.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and