Skip to main content

Strong Market or Bubble, Part 2?

We're taking a deeper look at market valuations today, and helping us in that task are a few articles taken from the most recent Big Picture "linkfest". Thanks to Barry for posting and drawing our attention to them.

The first item we'll highlight is a Wall Street Journal article entitled, "Wealth Hazard: Guessing Low on Profit Growth".

In this piece, Justin Lahart takes a look at the earnings picture for U.S. stocks and finds that second-quarter earnings could benefit from strength in overseas businesses and continued share buybacks:

Companies in the S&P also bought back $110 billion of stock in the first quarter, Standard & Poor's estimates. That brought the total over the past four quarters to $442 billion -- enough to buy the bottom 100 companies in the S&P 500. Buybacks reduce the number of shares outstanding, lifting earnings per share.

Second-quarter S&P 500 earnings are expected to be up just 3.2%, but analysts might again be short of the mark. Strength overseas, dollar weakness and share buybacks are still potent forces -- as
International Business Machines demonstrated last week when it said it had spent $12.5 billion to repurchase shares. In a complex transaction, IBM used overseas earnings to finance the buyback at a low tax rate.

Lahart goes on to note that factors that have recently contributed to higher earnings, such as share buybacks, dollar weakness, and elevated profit margins, "tend to be highly cyclical".

While the market could continue to rally on the back of these trends, valuations in the S&P 500 are anything but cheap, as shown by Robert Shiller's analysis of average annual earnings over a 10 year period.

All in all, Lahart's piece seems to take a very balanced view of the U.S. market. The Journal doesn't want to douse the market's fire just yet, but they are reporting the skeptical view of what's happening with valuations.

On to the second article, in which Mark Hulbert asks, "Is It Just a Strong Market, or the Bubble, Part 2?".

Hulbert seems to be working from similar ground, as his article draws on some of the same arguments concerning valuations (and comment sources) as the Lahart piece. Hulbert adds to this discussion by examining some recent behavioral finance studies relating to investor sentiment and "bubble-causing behavior".

Tip: in the wake of a burst bubble, watch out for the consistently observed formation of "bubble echoes".

And in our third piece, Prieur du Plessis and his colleagues at Plexus Asset Management conduct their own study on S&P 500 valuations
(using data from Shiller and others) and find that the market is, "by historical standards, not in cheap territory", thereby signaling lukewarm returns ahead.

Finance Trends readers may have noted similar sentiments shared by me in recent posts & comments.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…