Skip to main content

Ready for a retirement surprise?

A Bloomberg.com article by Kevin Haas asks the question, "are you saving enough"?

In, "Ready for a Big Retirement Surprise? Save Now", Haas lays out the case for examining retirement needs more closely and working towards saving the appropriate amounts.

This is a familiar refrain, but what's helpful about Haas' article is that its advice is based on two underlying, and important, real-world trends.

Put simply, many Americans underestimate the amounts they'll need for retirement. Add to this the knowledge that a large percentage of retirees wish they had saved more, and you will see that Americans are not saving enough.

An excerpt from "Retirement Surprise?":

The evidence suggests that many people aren't saving nearly that much. One study cited by Skinner found that fully a third of Americans see a drop in their consumption of at least 33 percent when they retire. Some 73 percent of retirees report that they wish they had saved more as they planned for retirement.

What's especially useful about this article, is that it points to the reality of ever increasing costs for services in areas (such as health care) where government regulation and intervention are high. This at least hints at the rising costs of living that have been papered over in the official government statistics on inflation.

And as we've seen from our recent post on inflation, this ongoing phenomenon distorts economic decision-making and leaves pensioners and retirees with an unknown variable in their retirement planning: the rate at which their money and savings are declining in value.

When more retirement planning articles make a point of addressing this issue, retirees (and other perceptive observers) will be better informed and better served. In the meantime, see Haas' article for ideas on how you can better plan your saving needs.

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...