Skip to main content

Banker's patents: locking down financial innovation

You've heard of patents on inventions and intellectual property.

Now the financial industry is looking to march in step with the trend towards patenting ideas and innovations, as bankers get ready to seize control over newly created financial products and service methods with patent protection.

The Financial Times reports on a possible sea change in the financial and investment industries in "Banks lay traps for copycats".

Bankers have historically been highly aggressive in protecting their turf – and profits – but surprisingly bad at stopping rivals from copying ideas. While patents are a vital tool for, say, pharmaceutical companies, their use has not been widespread in finance.

As a result, whenever a bank produces a startling innovation, it is quickly copied elsewhere.
When ABN Amro, for example, came up with a product called a “constant proportion debt obligation” last summer, other banks replicated the scheme within days.

In recent years, however, attitudes to intellectual property have undergone a subtle shift, as banks and other financial companies have become much more active in filing patents, particularly in the US.

Okay, that's the good news. Here's the downside (there's always a downside, right?):

Banks now view intellectual property as an important operational risk, say lawyers. Investment banks and other financial services companies are actively building portfolios of business process patents.

Some in the financial world view this with dismay. Satyajit Das, a former trader who now works as a consultant, argues that the rise of financial patents could crush innovation.

“Just imagine if something such as Black-Scholes had been patented – it would never have circulated so widely, and [created] the whole options market,” he says. “Patents will just end up enriching the lawyers.”

Lawyers – perhaps unsurprisingly – dispute this. “If you have patents in industry, why shouldn’t you protect intellectual property in finance too?” asks a lawyer at a US bank.

I remember a story in Michael Lewis' Liar's Poker that revolved around the issue of financial innovation in investment banks.

Working at Solomon Brothers in the 1980s, Lewis and a colleague managed to invent an entirely new product for speculating on German bonds (the exact nature of the product eludes me now), an idea that was subsequently stolen by a more highly-placed co-worker.

At that time, the invention of a new financial instrument was enough to give the originating firm a head start in that market and bragging rights over other firms. Over time, competitors would imitate or build on the product, making it more widely available. A very free market kind of ideal.

Now it seems, the rush to patent everything under the sun has hit another industry. While not as egregious as the practice of patenting human genomes, etc., it is another leg in the boat for IP and the industry that has grown up around it.

Is this wise? Maybe someone with a first hand view of this field will provide further insight. In the meantime, see another interesting viewpoint in "Bastiat on patents and monopoly".

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…