Skip to main content

Star "macro" funds lagged S&P 500

From the Bloomberg.com article, "Soros, Bacon, Jones Hedge Funds Lag Behind S&P 500":

Investors in hedge funds overseen by George Soros, Louis Bacon and Paul Jones would have made more money this year by buying shares of a stock-index mutual fund.

Managers of so-called macro hedge funds have lagged behind market benchmarks such as the Standard & Poor's 500 Index after being caught off guard by reversals in stock, bond and commodity prices. Macro funds, so named because they bet on broad economic trends, fare better when prices move up or down for a sustained period, which hasn't been the case in 2006 with investor opinions divided about the strength of the U.S. economy.

The "macro" style of hedge funds not only underperformed the S&P 500, they also failed to outpace the overall asset class.

Macro funds rose by an average 1.8 percent as of Oct. 24, compared with 5.6 percent for all hedge funds, according to data compiled by Hedge Fund Research Inc. of Chicago. The Vanguard 500 Index, the largest mutual fund to track the S&P 500 index, a broad measure of U.S. stocks, advanced 12 percent.

Last year, macro funds returned 6.8 percent, beating the Vanguard 500 by 2.2 percentage points.

The performance time frames are getting shorter for hedge fund managers; there have been many reports in recent years of investors zeroing in on monthly performance. So now, I guess when the managers and their funds are having an off year (as defined by their failure to beat benchmark X), they're more likely to see withdrawals of money.

I'm not that familiar with the funds run by Soros, Bacon and Jones, but I would guess their funds cater to a more experienced, higher echelon investor group. These are star managers who can probably demand stringent lockup terms on any outside capital they attract, and I'd guess that the investors would be oriented towards longer-term horizons.

Or am I wrong and is it the young hot-shots that everyone wants to give their money to? I don't know, I'll have to look into it. The newer group of hedge fund investors seem to be saying, "here, take my money and shoot the lights out. Just don't have a bad month!".

One axiom does come to mind: "new money is scared money".

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...