Skip to main content

Star "macro" funds lagged S&P 500

From the Bloomberg.com article, "Soros, Bacon, Jones Hedge Funds Lag Behind S&P 500":

Investors in hedge funds overseen by George Soros, Louis Bacon and Paul Jones would have made more money this year by buying shares of a stock-index mutual fund.

Managers of so-called macro hedge funds have lagged behind market benchmarks such as the Standard & Poor's 500 Index after being caught off guard by reversals in stock, bond and commodity prices. Macro funds, so named because they bet on broad economic trends, fare better when prices move up or down for a sustained period, which hasn't been the case in 2006 with investor opinions divided about the strength of the U.S. economy.

The "macro" style of hedge funds not only underperformed the S&P 500, they also failed to outpace the overall asset class.

Macro funds rose by an average 1.8 percent as of Oct. 24, compared with 5.6 percent for all hedge funds, according to data compiled by Hedge Fund Research Inc. of Chicago. The Vanguard 500 Index, the largest mutual fund to track the S&P 500 index, a broad measure of U.S. stocks, advanced 12 percent.

Last year, macro funds returned 6.8 percent, beating the Vanguard 500 by 2.2 percentage points.

The performance time frames are getting shorter for hedge fund managers; there have been many reports in recent years of investors zeroing in on monthly performance. So now, I guess when the managers and their funds are having an off year (as defined by their failure to beat benchmark X), they're more likely to see withdrawals of money.

I'm not that familiar with the funds run by Soros, Bacon and Jones, but I would guess their funds cater to a more experienced, higher echelon investor group. These are star managers who can probably demand stringent lockup terms on any outside capital they attract, and I'd guess that the investors would be oriented towards longer-term horizons.

Or am I wrong and is it the young hot-shots that everyone wants to give their money to? I don't know, I'll have to look into it. The newer group of hedge fund investors seem to be saying, "here, take my money and shoot the lights out. Just don't have a bad month!".

One axiom does come to mind: "new money is scared money".

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…