Skip to main content

Estimate puts Iraqi death toll over 600,000

The death toll in Iraq has climbed to over 600,000 since the beginning of the US-led invasion, according to a survey released by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad. The survey findings were published today's online edition of the The Lancet, according to Bloomberg.com.

The methodology behind the survey is currently being debated; President Bush has said that he does not find the report to be credible.

``I don't consider it a credible report; neither does General Casey and neither do Iraqi officials,'' Bush said when asked about the study at a White House news conference. The study's methodology is ``pretty well discredited,'' he said.

The survey collectors visited 47 randomly selected areas and interviewed over 12,000 particpants to find the numbers of births and deaths for each household during a specified time period. The numbers were then multiplied to represent Iraq's total population of 26 million. For more on the survey methods, see Bloomberg's report and this Chicago Tribune article.

Many of us are taken aback at the total put forth in this survey. Could this estimate really be close to the mark, or is there a serious flaw in this style of statistical survey? Are the Lancet studies politically motivated to put out such shocking figures at election times, as some have suggested?

We have been getting reports of civilian deaths in Iraq numbering in the tens of thousands over the past year or so. This in itself is highly tragic and horrifying, especially given the ridiculous rationalizations for going to war that were bandied about before and after the fact.

I think it's time we took our heads up out of the sand and start paying attention to this war and the suffering that has occured in its wake. I really don't know how many people were even alert to the fact that an estimated 30,000-50,000 civilians were killed in Iraq since the invasion began. Will an estimate that increases the death toll by a factor of ten or more wake people up?

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…