Skip to main content

Deals galore!

The Financial Times ran a special report section on corporate finance today that included a very relevant article by Gillian Tett.

In, "Deals galore in a world awash in cheap money", Tett examines the relationship between easy money and an increased number of corporate buyout deals.

Private equity firms have led the latest buyout craze, thanks to increased investor participation in their funds and new ways to finance deals. As the author points out, the number of deals have increased, along with the bid prices.

One reason why private equity firms have been able to make these audaciously large bids in recent years is that investors are clamouring to put money in their funds.

However, another equally important factor is that the debt capital markets have been extremely accommodating. This partly reflects the fact that the global financial system has been awash with cash, after several years in which central bankers have kept interest rates low.

However, it also reflects a bigger structual change now afoot. For although companies used to have a very limited range of choices about how they raised finance, these days the options are getting wider, as investment banks become more adept at providing innovative issuance tools.

At the same time, the attitude of investors is changing. Whereas banks used to purchase the bulk of loans in Europe, hedge funds are now jumping eagerly into this sphere, together with specialist structured portfolio managers who run vehicles known as collateralised loan obligations (CLOs).

This has created a vast pool of investors wanting to purchase leveraged – or risky – loans, and has meant that the funding that can be placed in the market is consequently far greater in scale.

“There is a massive shift of assets under way from European banks to hedge funds and asset managers,” says Michael McLaughlin, head of global structured products at Bank of America.


I think this story really goes along with the trends described in the recent Economist article on debt. The game is changing and the creation of credit and what we call "money" becomes increasingly complex, a point I believe Doug Noland has made in the past.

We've asked before how new money and credit creation was affecting merger and buyout activity; I think we're starting to see some of the answers.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR pic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7 — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .