Skip to main content

Lessons from Australian housing boom?

Not the first article we've seen drawing parallels between the property booms in Australia and America, but Reuters serves up some interesting points in this piece, entitled "Australia's housing tale holds lessons for US".

Key points from the article:

1) While similarities exist among these property booms, it's likely that eventual outcomes will be influenced by differences between the two.

2) Goldman Sachs economists studying the issue felt a housing slump would have a more pronounced effect on the American economy.

"They argued that a downturn in housing would have a far greater impact on U.S. consumption than in Australia since American consumers had largely used equity withdrawn from their homes to fund spending.

While Australians had withdrawn just as much equity as Americans -- equal to about 10 percent of disposable income -- they spent far less of it."


3) Differences in the national economies. Australia is being kept afloat thanks in part to its strategic role in resource market. A bull market in commodities and natural resources is enriching the country and floating its share market higher. This has helped smooth over any losses suffered in the housing market.

"The global commodity boom came just as the housing market was tipping over and saved Australia from a likely recession," said Su-Lin Ong, senior economist at RBC Capital Markets.

"What will save the U.S. as their housing market turns? Consumers are in debt up to their eyeballs and fiscal policy is maxed out," she warned.

Interesting reading for anyone who has been following the "real-estate bubble" debate.

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...