Skip to main content

Sarbanes-Oxley reform

A July 31 Financial Times article focuses on one politician's drive to reform the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation. Tom Feeney, a congressman in Washington D.C., says that certain provisions of SOX impose significant time and cost burdens on companies forced to comply.

This, he has learned, is hampering our ability to attract public corporations to our capital markets. From FT's article, "Advocate of SOX reform points to capital markets leak":

Mr Feeney's beef includes the usual criticisms of SOX: that its most burdensome provisions - enshrined in section 404 - are adding unnecessarily to companies' auditing costs and that it is tying up too much executive time.

But he warns it has also led to an "outsourcing of America's 100-year lead in capital formation" as companies shun US stock markets and seek listings in London and Hong Kong instead.

"Last year, while I was on a listening tour of bankers associations and the Chicago [derivatives] exchanges, the evidence was starting to come out in dribs and drabs. Now there's a sort of fire hydrant of evidence that we have a huge leak in our capital markets," the Republican congressman says.

He casts himself in the role of "an American economic Paul Revere" with his warnings. "The British are coming," he says, using the words of the hero of the war of independence. "And by the way, so is Luxembourg coming, and Hong Kong, Shanghai and a dozen other markets. I think it has already started being bad for America."

For an earlier look at the rise of foreign listings and stirrings against SOX legislation, please see, "Exchange Fever".

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...