Skip to main content

The Inflation Tax

Ron Paul on "The Inflation Tax":

All government spending represents a tax. The inflation tax, while largely ignored, hurts middle-class and low-income Americans the most. Simply put, printing money to pay for federal spending dilutes the value of the dollar, which causes higher prices for goods and services. Inflation may be an indirect tax, but it is very real- the individuals who suffer most from cost of living increases certainly pay a "tax."

The erosion of purchasing power and ensuing increase in the cost of living is a recurring theme in Ron Paul's speeches on inflation. And why not? These phenomena must have accompanied every inflation known to man. Representative Paul is attempting to make clear, to his constituents and the politicians who should be representing their constituents, that inflation acts as a hidden tax. Slowly but surely, even a "properly managed" fiat currency will lose its "value" (read: purchasing power) over time.

In fact, you could make the case that inflation represents a form of double taxation. You are paying higher prices for goods and services, while at the same time experiencing a decline in your standard of living. People take on more work and increasing amounts of debt just so they can maintain their lifestyles and an outward appearance of prosperity. Mothers leave their children to enter the workforce, hoping to achieve financial stability by adding a second income to the household. Still, we find ourselves deeper in debt than our parents' generation, consoled though we may be by the appearance of luxury items that surround us.

The average person is running in place on a treadmill that leads to nowhere.

As the inflation progresses, the quality of goods and services becomes watered down. Many of the goods we buy today are engineered for obselescence, and even the simplest products have a relatively short shelf life (ever heard the complaints about Wal Mart hammers?). Do you feel wealthier because you are able to afford a dozen crappy hammers?

Please do not be fooled by the BLS' assertion that substituting hamburger for steak represents a comparable trade off of purchased goods. While it might play in the broadcast studio, it won't wash here.

For more on the redefining of inflation, see "The Core Rate" by Jim Puplava.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…