Skip to main content

The case for commodities

A brief rundown of the commodity market in the wake of the recent correction. Commodity prices have shown some strong performance in the past week. Many individual commodities enjoyed notable gains last week, continuing the move off their recent lows.

Some of those gains were reversed on Monday, as base metals such as copper and zinc gave up some ground in a thin and volatile trading session. Nickel managed to close higher, as LME nickel inventories declined.

The Financial Times reported in their weekend edition (July 1/July 2) that the commodity sector had one of its "best first-half performances ever". So, is this outperformance the sign of a bubble, as we so frequently heard before and during the latest market correction, which hit commodities and many emerging markets worldwide?

Someone once famously remarked that we can only judge a bubble in hindsight. Assuming, for a moment, that we buy this line of reasoning, let us ask instead if the recent drop was a bull market-ending correction. Let's focus strictly on price action and take a quick look at how some of the commodities have withstood the recent market rout.

These figures are taken from the Financial Times weekend report previously mentioned. Results of trading that followed the report (and any resulting price changes) are unaccounted for.

IPE Brent Crude - up 26 percent year to date.

West Texas Intermediate crude - over 20 percent gain YTD.

Gold - up around 19 percent to date this year despite the recent $100+ drop from its peak.

Silver - up 25 percent so far this year despite correction from the $14 area.

Copper - "surged" 67 percent YTD.

Zinc - 71 percent increase in the first six months of the year.

Nickel - 58 percent gain so far this year.

This bit of information does not cover the commodity complex as a whole, but I think it serves as illustration of a simple fact: even the commodities singled out as objects of speculation are holding onto their gains in the wake of this recent market correction.

Leaving aside the larger issues of supply and demand, market psychology, and the fact that some commodity sectors have yet to enjoy their day in the sun, price action so far seems to indicate strength rather than weakness. Until the price action shows that an individual commodity, or commodities as a whole, start to weaken considerably or signal a change in trend, it would probably be premature to call an end to a bull market.

Of course, no commentary on the commodity bull market would be complete without the added news of Jim Rogers' continued bullishness. As FN Arena News reports, in a recent interview with Credit Suisse, Rogers maintained that the current bull market has a long way to go. Judging by the length of previous cycles, Rogers estimates that the current bull move in tangible assets won't peak until somewhere around 2014-2022.

We'll leave it there for now. Happy Independence Day to all readers and their families.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance, I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart.

So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like. 

Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ$BCORpic.twitter.com/xjsMk433H7
— David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015
For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan, turned to rubble.

As detailed in our post, "Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months. 

In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the stock soon peaked and began a…

New! Finance Trends now at FinanceTrendsLetter.com

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL! 

Please bookmark our new web address at Financetrendsletter.com

Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner.  



Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead!

As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter. You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter). 

Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter.

Moneyball: How the Red Sox Win Championships

Welcome, readers. To get the first look at brand new posts (like the following piece) and to receive our exclusive email list updates, please subscribe to the Finance Trends Newsletter.

The Boston Red Sox won their fourth World Series titleof the 21st century this week.

Having won their first Series in 86 years back in 2004, the last decade-plus has marked a very strong return to form for one of baseball's oldest big league clubs. So how did they do it?

Quick background: in late 2002, team owner and hedge fund manager,John W. Henry(with his partners)bought the Boston Red Sox and its historic Fenway Park for a reported sum of $695 million.

Henry and Co. quickly set out to find their ideal General Manager (GM) to help turn around their newly acquired, ailing ship.

This brings us to one of my favorite scenes from the 2011 film, Moneyball, in which John W. Henry (played by Arliss Howard) attempts to woo Oakland A's GM Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) over to Boston with an excellent job off…