Skip to main content

Inflation: your ignorance is showing

I have to give it to Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific Capital for going on CNBC recently and sticking his neck out by trying to explain what inflation really is to the Bubblehead community.

Last week on the Financial Sense Newshour (June 17th 3rd hour segment), Jim Puplava and John Loeffler played back an on air debate between Peter and Diane Swonk of Mesirow Financial that centered on the basic definition of inflation and how it comes about. Jim and John then paused the playback at points to discuss and respond to the counterarguments and sophistry put forth by "economist" Swonk.

To say that Peter's debate opponent lacked knowledge of the true nature of inflation would be putting it mildly. Video file of the June 13 CNBC Squawk Box debate. Squawk being the operative word here.

Swonk's willful ignorance and the arrogance that inevitably accompanies it are on full display here. Sadly, this type of attitude is prevalent throughout the 24-hour media spectrum, and this is what passes for news and "insightful commentary" these days.

There is no shame in not having an understanding of a certain issue or topic. None of us can ever know all there is to know in the world or even a small fraction of it. The proper thing is to get the best possible understanding of an area of interest before passing one's self off as an expert.

If anyone reading this entry would like a more classic understanding of inflation, please see Jim Puplava's excellent 2 part article series, "The Great Inflation". I highly recommend Jim's writing and commentary as an introduction to some of the more complex, and often misunderstood, economic and financial issues.

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...