Skip to main content

Will Gulf nations diversify away from US dollar?

There has been a good deal of discussion, for some time now, about the desire central banks have to "diversify" out of some of their large dollar holdings. Foreign central banks often hold dollar denominated assets as reserves, and some feel that certain banks may have far too many dollar reserves, given the US government's current financial condition.

It is with this theme in mind that I include today's article from Ame Info. What I liked about this piece was its take on the timing aspect of central bank decisions. It has often been noted that in retrospect, key moves by central banks often come at the exact wrong moment in terms of market advantage. When central banks across the globe were dumping gold in the late 90s and the early part of this decade, their sales actually coincided with the ending stage of the metal's bear market. Could widespread sentiment about the death of the dollar actually signal its return to form, thereby giving central banks a "head fake", or will the the dollar bear market prove to be a lasting trend?

My only quibble with the piece is that its author seems to take solace in the idea that inflation and dollar weakness will be averted by the current cycle of interest rate raising. While quarter point rises in interest rates may lead some to believe that central banks in US and Europe are tightening money conditions, the relationship between inflation and expanding money supply across the globe has gone largely unnoticed. Can "easy money" conditions really turn into tight money while measures of broad money supply show no shortage of money creation across the globe? It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the longer term; that much can be said.

In the meantime, officials from Gulf Cooperation Countries say they will consider moving a sizeable portion of their foreign reserves into euros. Will central banks be rewarded for their trading acumen or simply be duped into favoring one problematic fiat currency over another? Only time will tell.

Popular posts from this blog

Nasdaq credit rating junked.

S&P cut Nasdaq's credit rating to junk status citing debt burdens and its questionable strategy to buy a controlling interest in the London Stock Exchange. Financial Times reported that the exchange's counterparty credit & bank loan rating were lowered fromm BBB- (lowest investment grade rating) to BB+. The change will increase Nasdaq's borrowing costs should it wish to pursue aquisition targets. For an earlier look at the exchange consolidation trend that brought about Nasdaq's push for a stake in the LSE, please see "Exchange fever" .

Clean Money - John Rubino: Book review

Clean Money by John Rubino 274 pages. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 1st Edition. The bouyant stock market environment of the past several years is gone, and the financial wreckage of 2008 is still sharp in our minds as a new year starts to unfold. Given the recent across-the-board-declines in global stock markets (and most asset classes) that have left many investors shell-shocked, you might wonder if there is any good reason to consider the merits of a hot new investment theme, such as clean energy. However, we shouldn't be too hasty to write off all future stock investments. After all, the market declines of 2008 may continue into 2009, but they may also leave interesting investment opportunities in their wake. Which brings us to the subject of this review. John Rubino, author and editor of GreenStockInvesting.com , recently released a new book on renewable energy and clean-tech investing entitled, Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom . In Clean ...

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and...