Skip to main content

Recent gold action

Gold traded over $600 during Thursday's session, closing at $599.70 in New York. Since $600 gold has been getting a fair amount of news coverage, let's examine the reasons being trotted out to explain the rising gold price.

A Bloomberg article points to investment fund buying as a main factor driving recent price strength. Also discussed was the "inflation risk" that makes holding gold more attractive for investors, especially in an environment of low real rates. A surprisingly credible argument for gold's strength managed to make its way into the article: ``The market perceives an inflation risk, although it hasn't shown up in some of the government statistics,'' said Michael Cuggino, portfolio manager of Permanent Portfolio Fund in San Francisco. ``Low to negative real interest rates after inflation are generally bullish for gold.''

Unfortunately, Bloomberg's report did not end on such a sensible note. Another source weighed in with the following remarks, ``We're entering bubble territory,'' said Christoph Eibl, head of commodities trading at Zug, Switzerland-based Tiberius Asset Management AG., which has holdings in energy, metals and agricultural commodities. ``Prices have moved away from reality, and are no longer linked to fundamentals.''

I find that last comment to be a bit absurd if it was made in specific reference to gold. Certainly, one could say that commodities in general have undergone an astounding advance, and it is possible that certain commodities now carry a speculative premium in their price (as discussed by Dr. Marc Faber in a recent interview). However, I think it is odd to declare, in a discussion centered specifically on gold, that prices are "no longer linked to fundamentals" when the recent chain of events (and the metal's current strength against most major currencies) clearly suggests the opposite.

As mentioned in the Bloomberg article, investment demand has come on strongly, and investment purchases of gold have outstripped jeweler purchases so far this year. This in itself is huge. Where was investment demand for gold just a few short years ago? Not long ago, most people looked at you cross-eyed or at least gave you the third degree questioning when an investment in gold was suggested. Since gold crossed $500, a new attitude has begun to replace the former stance of suspicion. The small cadre of dedicated goldbugs hoarding bullion and gold coins has been enlarged to include an investor class that gets its exposure to gold through ETFs and precious metals-focused funds. A change in sentiment is clearly underway as the investing public and investment professionals increasingly warm to gold.

Not only is investment demand up in North America, it is profoundly evident in Asia and the Middle East. The people of India and China have traditionally been buyers of gold, in the form of jewelry and as a store of savings. Their purchases will only increase over time, as their economies continue to develop and prosperity levels rise among the masses. Middle Eastern demand is pronounced as ever, with the Gulf economies prospering from a recent oil boom and the resulting flood of new money. An ongoing repatriation of funds previously held abroad, and the establishment of the Dubai Gold Exchange, have no doubt also encouraged gold purchases. Meanwhile, a sizeable increase in Gulf central bank holdings of US dollar reserves have led some to consider diversifying out of the dollar and increasing the region's central bank gold reserves as Russia, Argentina and China have done.

There will not be an easily mineable influx of supply to meet this demand. Gold mining companies face a dwindling resource base and rising costs in extracting gold from the ground. Consider the environmental hurdles and permitting difficulties associated with bringing on new mines in many jurisdictions, along with the increasing push for nationalization of "strategic resources" in Latin American countries, and it becomes a little unclear as to where all this gold will be found.

These facts are not being expressed in the mainstream US business press. Rather than give due weight to the big picture trends driving the gold price, most coverage derides the advance as being speculative in nature. But is that a surprise? A current CNN Money article reads, "$600 gold: Want in? Think twice". While the article dutifully describes several options for prospective gold investors and the risks associated, it ends in a dissuading tone. "Not everybody could handle losing 40 percent in one year...Most people probably don't need an investment in precious metal funds."

I guess it's just one more brick in a wall of worry.

Popular posts from this blog

The Dot-Com Bubble in 1 Chart: InfoSpace

With all the recent talk of a new bubble in the making, thanks in part to the Yellen Fed's continued easy money stance , I thought it'd be instructive to revisit our previous stock market bubble - in one quick chart. So here's what a real stock market bubble looks like.  Here's what a bubble *really* looks like. InfoSpace in 1999-2001. $QQQ $BCOR — David Shvartsman (@FinanceTrends) February 24, 2015   For those of you who are a little too young to recall it, this is a chart of InfoSpace at the height of the Nasdaq dot-com bubble in 1999-2001. This fallen angel soared to fantastic heights only to plummet back down to earth as the bubble, and InfoSpace's shady business plan , turned to rubble. As detailed in our post, " Round trip stocks: Momentum booms and busts ", InfoSpace rocketed from under $100 a share to over $1,300 a share in less than six months.  In a pattern common to many parabolic shooting stars, the s

Jesse Livermore: How to Trade in Stocks (1940 Ed. E-book)

If you've been around markets for any length of time, you've probably heard of 20th century supertrader, Jesse Livermore . Today we're highlighting his rare 1940 work, How to Trade in Stocks (ebook, pdf). But first, a brief overview of Livermore's life and trading career (bio from Jesse Livermore's Wikipedia entry). "During his lifetime, Livermore gained and lost several multi-million dollar fortunes. Most notably, he was worth $3 million and $100 million after the 1907 and 1929 market crashes, respectively. He subsequently lost both fortunes. Apart from his success as a securities speculator, Livermore left traders a working philosophy for trading securities that emphasizes increasing the size of one's position as it goes in the right direction and cutting losses quickly. Ironically, Livermore sometimes did not follow his rules strictly. He claimed that lack of adherence to his own rules was the main reason for his losses after making his 1907 and

New! Finance Trends now at

Update for our readers: Finance Trends has a new URL!  Please bookmark our new web address at Readers sticking with RSS updates should point your feed readers to our new Finance Trends feedburner .   Thank you to all of our loyal readers who have been with us since the early days. Exciting stuff to come in the weeks ahead! As a quick reminder, you can subscribe to our free email list to receive the Finance Trends Newsletter . You'll receive email updates about once every 4-8 weeks (about 2-3 times per quarter).  Stay up to date with our real-time insights and updates on Twitter .